Ruby 2 3: Working with immutable strings

Since the router is used for every web page request, it needs to be fast. That means a lot of frozen string literals. While comments are typically ignored by Ruby, special “magic comments” contain directives that affect how the code is interpreted. Top-level magic comments must start on the first line, or on the second line if the first line looks like #!

  • By making strings immutable there are a whole class of errors like this that become impossible.
  • I thought about the use of the magic comment and decided to give it a try.
  • The freeze method in Ruby is used to ensure that an object cannot be modified.
  • When you freeze a string literal, you’re telling Ruby to not let any of your programs modify the string literal .

Objects should never change after they’ve been initialized. Every get_key is called, it will allocate new copy of “my_key”, which is then immediately thrown away as garbage. It sounds like there is a benefit to use this feature but not everywhere, the exact result I saw in performance graphs. Response times drastically improved as you can see from the above graph. Mike includes some benchmarks that show improved memory footprint for Sidekiq. Gets called if no message is specified when calling add_offense or add_global_offense Cops are discouraged to override this; instead pass your message directly.

It’s Misunderstood

As a result, many premature, inscrutable programming decisions have been made in performance’s name. Didn’t we just append to an immutable object? Even worse, this magic comment is frequently misunderstood. This particular magic comment, however, has a unique history.

ruby frozen string literal

Since the 2.3.0 release of Ruby, there’s been the optional feature to make all string literals frozen. This means that any string literal within your code is frozen and cannot be modified. First, it’s important to note that this change is just the first step towards all string literals becoming immutable in Ruby 3. String literals are simply strings that are created using Ruby’s built-in string syntax. This includes those created using double quotes (“), single quotes (‘), or the special forms %Q and %q.

Frozen_string_literal reduces the generated garbage by ~100MB or ~20%! Free performance by adding a one line comment. I am still exploring when to use the magic comment and when it shouldn’t be used. If you are using this throughout your applications it might be worth measuring with and without their use.

frozen_string_literal: the not so magical comment

Today I checked one of the solutions made by our Junior Rails Developer classstudent. As part of the course they make Rails apps but also learn from smaller code examples delivered by exercism.io. It appears that the guidance in this area may have changed, as StyleCop now enforces the use of the C# specific aliases.

In this post I am running through the basic concepts of literals, strings, and the benefits of frozen objects in Ruby. If you feel like you understand this, jump straight on over to part two which covers the new Frozen String Literal feature in Ruby 2.3 and beyond. Beyond the actual usage changes, it’s probably worth https://cryptonews.wiki/ adding in the pragma comment across all of your files. That may initially seem like hard work, but you can enforce this via RuboCop, and add them to existing projects with pragmater. In this mode, all values assigned to constants are deeply copied and made shareable. It is safer mode than experimental_everything.

A “string literal” is a sequence of characters from the source character set enclosed in double quotation marks (” “). String literals are used to represent a sequence of characters which, taken together, form a null-terminated string. Encoding Encryption Hashing and Obfuscation in Java There is no way to unfreeze a frozen object. The frozen state is stored within the object. Calling freeze sets the frozen state and thereby prevents further modification. This includes modifications to the object’s frozen state.

Identical string literals are relatively common, particularly in large frameworks. Some estimates put the saving of object allocation as high as 30 percent of all string literals. So, making this change introduces some pain, but we can be reasonably sure that it will also bring real benefits. By freezing string literals, your program will raise an exception when trying to modify the string literal. A word of caution – the positive and negative string literals result in code that’s pretty weird, so you should use them sparingly.

It makes the code uglier and needs to be called everywhere you declare a String. You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. The deploy was done after hours one evening and I was ready to witness the magic. I have been working on a project over the past year for a client with a large Ruby on Rails application.

Ruby Frozen_String_Literal With Code Examples

Last week I removed all those calls and added a frozen_string_literal comment to all Ruby files. I read up on the use of this magic comment use in other projects and the results seen. One in particular was Sidekiq from Mike Perham. Mike documented his use of the magic comment and how it improved his use and helped cleanup his code. It is surprising to me when comments in Ruby are evaluated. I feel that magic comments detract from the readability of a Ruby file, because I have to know something unusual to read the code.

If you’re preparing for the upcoming Ruby 2.3 release, you’re in the right place. Let’s take a look at what this all means, and how it will affect every day programming in Ruby. As it goes with most updates, there will be some short term pain as Ruby changes to make string literals immutable by default.

  • But you can assign new string or change its reference.
  • The term ‘frozen’ is Ruby’s way of saying immutable, which is a technical way of saying something cannot be changed.
  • So making them immutable by default probably won’t bring any performance benefits, but it will certainly bring some pain.

The good news is that it will happen gradually, and it won’t be difficult to detect and fix existing code that’s affected by this change. In return, we’re going to get a version of Ruby that uses less memory and thus runs a bit quicker. Given the low overhead of having to call ‘dup’ when we want an unfrozen string, this is certainly a tradeoff worth making. The freeze method in Ruby is used to ensure that an object cannot be modified. This method is a great way to create immutable objects. Any attempt to modify an object that has called the freeze method will result in the program throwing a runtime error.

There were a few years when folks were sprinkling .freeze calls on all the string literals for the performance benefits. The magic comment is preferable for readability. I’m no benchmarking expert, but some quick tests locally have suggested that using frozen string literals does make code using a lot of literals a bit faster. At the time of writing, these gems all have patches that cover frozen string literals that will be part of their upcoming releases. It improves application performance by not allocating new space for the same string, thereby also saving time for garbage collection chores. When you freeze a string literal, you’re telling Ruby to not let any of your programs modify the string literal .

By freezing string literals, your program will raise an exception when trying to modify the string literal.

Blocks are a handy and powerful feature in Ruby, and we can use them anywhere. Blocks are anonymous pieces of code that accept input from arguments and return a value. I believe that performance can be an ‘Appeal to Common Belief’ fallacy. The winds are against you anytime you argue against it.

  • It sounds like there is a benefit to use this feature but not everywhere, the exact result I saw in performance graphs.
  • So, making this change introduces some pain, but we can be reasonably sure that it will also bring real benefits.
  • Since version 2.3 Ruby has ability to freeze string literals.
  • It’s a deprecation warning that is not ever going to be resolvable.
  • Consider the value this comment brings to your code.
  • Free performance by adding a one line comment.

Any others have more information to share, please reach out. I noticed right away the response times of API calls were slower, not faster. Maybe I was seeing the effects 10 Awesome Kid-Friendly YouTube Channels for Kids Interested in Coding of cold cache calls and things would improve overnight. Note that the cop will accept files where the comment exists but is set to false instead of true.

What are Ruby blocks?

I thought about the use of the magic comment and decided to give it a try. I added it to every Ruby file in the project and was included as part of the weekly deploy. Frozen string literals reduce object allocations because Ruby doesn’t allocate the same content in a new string object each time the literal is encountered. In Ruby, whenever you have a statement defining a string as a literal, it’s a new object, with its own space in memory. «a» in one line of your code and «a» in another have the same contents, but are separate. And if those statements are called more than once, then every time they’re called, new strings are allocated in memory.